|« Letters and opinions
The Polish Brethren and the Founding FathersAuthor of this text: W. Paul Tabaka
To: Kaz Dziamka, Editor
My name is W. Paul Tabaka, from Poland, presently in Los Angeles,
California. I have found your page upon search for 'Sierakowski Socinian' via
What would Jefferson and Madison in Warsaw [sic]. While I had not read
your article on „Jefferson and Madison in Warsaw" throughout, it seems
to me that I would largely support your propositions.
What is missing in it are certain Polish traditions of rationalist
thought, namely the Polish Brethren. (At least I had not spotted at trace of
your mentioning them) : the Fratres Polonorum, or anti-Trinitarians, also called
Socinians and ultimately called Unitarians.
If you had made some time for brief examination of some of my recent
the entire directory http://geocities.com/paultabaka
can also be browsed through
You might note the strong tradition of religious liberty coming from
nowhere else than Poland.
John Locke was preceded by a few decades by Samuel Przypkowski on
tolerance, by Andrzej Wiszowaty on 'rational religion'. Newton had met Samuel
Crell of the Spinowski family (originally Krell from Germany).
Englishman John Bidle had translated two works by said Przypkowski ;
also the Racovian Catechism ; and a work by J. Stegmann, a „Polish Brother"
Bidle's followers had very close relations with the Polish Socinian
family of Crellius (aka Spinowski). Pleae note http://geocities.com/paultabaka/stuckey.html
Subsequently, the Unitarian branch of Christianity was continued with
by, most notably, Joseph Priestley, who had emigrated to the U. S. A. and was a friend of both James Madison and Thomas Jefferson whom you mention.
Jefferson had claimed to be a 'Unitarian' and credited Priestley with
having converted him onto that faith.
You may note that Priestley was very well informed on the earlier
developments in Poland, especially by his mentions of Socinius and Szymon Budny.
While I would have no notion — how exactly to use these data in the
context of Polish conditions these days, I am yet sure that they can be relevant.
Please let me know what you think. Mine being an on-going research,
there are more data which I had not yet entered into my pages.
W. Paul Tabaka
for your letter of Nov. 19.
don't see why I should include in my essay what you describe as „rationalist
thought" of the Polish Brethren, who after all were Christians. I don't
define „rationalism" in such a liberal manner, a logical flaw I consider a contradiction in terms.
my paper is focused on what Madison and Jefferson would do today to help design
Polish democracy. I am not interested in what the Polish Brethren would do or
say. Unitarians, both Polish or American, are allies of religious humanists
perhaps, or are believed to be such allies. But they are not intellectual allies
of secular humanists, who insist (and I agree, of course) that secular humanism
is not a religion in any meaningful sense.
thing that I find objectionable in your letter is your statement that „the
strong tradition of religious liberty come[s] from nowhere else than Poland."
This idea to me is a persistent Polish myth that religious tolerance is
the same as religious liberty and that Poland's tradition of religious
tolerance was unprecedented and became an inspiration for the Founding Fathers.
There is no evidence that such a claim is hardly more that wishful
also admit that you have not read my article "throughout," an
admission I find rather disappointing. Why bother to critique anything if you
have not read it throughout?
But I will check out the websites you have recommended. I am always open to new
« Letters and opinions (Published: 29-11-2003 )
All rights reserved. Copyrights belongs to author and/or Racjonalista.pl portal. No part of the content may be copied, reproducted nor use in any form without copyright holder's consent. Any breach of these rights is subject to Polish and international law.